In the case of Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners (2024 COA 78), the Colorado Court of Appeals reviewed a complex contract dispute related to the design and construction of a transit rail line. The project, commissioned by the Regional Transportation District (“RTD”), involved a collaboration between Regional Rail Partners and Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company (“Wadsworth”) to build the North Metro Rail Line between Denver Union Station and Thornton.
Key Facts:
- Contracts and Payments: Regional Rail Partners contracted with Wadsworth to perform specific construction tasks with a total contract value of $60,210,783. By the time of the trial, Regional Rail had paid almost $58 million of this amount.
- Disputes and Delays: The project faced numerous delays and disputes, leading to Wadsworth claiming significant financial damages attributed to these disruptions. In April 2018, Wadsworth’s expert estimated that Regional Rail owed them $12,408,496.60.
- Verified Statements of Claim: On September 11, 2018, Wadsworth filed a verified statement of claim for $15,774,855.56, later amending it to $12,764,572.40. This claim was based on amounts allegedly due for labor, materials, and other supplies under the Colorado Public Works Act.
- Legal Proceedings: Regional Rail contested the claims, arguing they were excessive and included amounts not permissible under the Act. They also posted a bond to substitute the verified claim. The trial resulted in a split verdict, with the court awarding $5,718,135 to Wadsworth and $514,666.64 to Regional Rail for counterclaims.
Legal Analysis and Court of Appeals’ Findings
The core legal issue revolved around the interpretation of the Colorado Public Works Act, specifically whether unliquidated breach of contract claims for delay damages could be included in a verified statement of claim and the consequences of filing an excessive claim under the Act.
- Inclusion of Delay Damages: The Court concluded that Wadsworth’s amended verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated damages for delays, which are not covered under the scope of C.R.S. § 38-26-107. This section permits claims only for amounts due for labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies.
- Excessive Claim and Forfeiture: The Court determined that Wadsworth knowingly included amounts in its claim that were not due under the statute, rendering the claim excessive. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-110, filing an excessive claim results in the forfeiture of the entire claim.
- Judgment Adjustments: As a result, the judgment in favor of Wadsworth was reversed to the extent it included the excessive claim amounts. However, the Court upheld certain aspects of the trial court’s decision, including rejecting Regional Rail’s counterclaims related to damages apportionment.
Warning Regarding Excessive Verified Statements of Claim
This case serves as a crucial warning for contractors and subcontractors working on public works projects in Colorado. Filing an excessive verified statement of claim under the Colorado Public Works Act can have severe consequences, including the forfeiture of the entire claim. It is essential to ensure that all claimed amounts strictly comply with the permissible categories under the Act and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that are not immediately due and payable.
The post Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims appeared first on Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC.